Cases 11 - 20 of 828,970
Cook v. Yetman et al
as 4:2024cv00776
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Cook
Defendant:
Officer M. Yetman, A. Shumate and St. Francois County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ettaghi et al v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv01050
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Hyatt Ettaghi and Csilla Zsok
Defendant:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Davis v. Cooke et al
as 3:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Terrance Davis
Defendant:
Tasheena Cooke and Andrew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOOSLBY v. WATSON et al
as 2:2024cv06670
Plaintiff:
MIHWA GOOSLBY
Other:
DEVANTA WATSON and AL & AY TRANSPORTATION INC.
Cross Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-5 and ABC CORP. 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
MONSTER MECHANICAL, LLC v. MECHANICAL MONSTER
as 2:2024cv06677
Plaintiff:
MONSTER MECHANICAL, LLC
Defendant:
MECHANICAL MONSTER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
YOUNG v. U.S. BANK et al
as 2:2024cv02315
Plaintiff:
KASHMIR S. YOUNG
Defendant:
U.S. BANK, SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE COMPANY and NEW RESIDENTIAL INVESTMENT CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
SHUMACHER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
as 2:2024cv02403
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J SHUMACHER
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Beiler Brothers Roofing v. SWEIGART et al
as 2:2024cv02401
Plaintiff:
Beiler Brothers Roofing
Defendant:
TRAVIS S SWEIGART and Raynes & Lawn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
