Cases 41 - 50 of 460,179
Wellman v. USA
as 7:2024cv00541
Petitioner:
Corey Wellman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
TERRY v. USA
as 1:2024cv00530
Petitioner:
GARY IVAN TERRY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
JOSEPH K. BOETTCHER and CATHERINE A. BOETTCHER v. ABB INC., Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to Bailey Controls and ITE Imperial Company f/k/a ITE Circuit Breaker Company et al
as 2:2024cv02788
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH K. BOETTCHER and CATHERINE A. BOETTCHER
Defendant:
ABB INC., Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to Bailey Controls and ITE Imperial Company f/k/a ITE Circuit Breaker Company, AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Mirasoles Produce USA, LLC v. Mena Produce, LLC et al
as 7:2024cv00251
Defendant:
Cesar Alejandro Mena Garcia, Mena Produce, LLC and Cesar Mena
Plaintiff:
Mirasoles Produce USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
FieldTurf USA, Inc. v. Fielder's Choice, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
FieldTurf USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Fielder's Choice, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HARMONIA HOLDINGS GROUP, LLC v. USA
as 1:2024cv00981
Plaintiff:
HARMONIA HOLDINGS GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
COLEMAN v. USA
as 1:2024cv00976
Plaintiff:
PHYLLIS ZENO COLEMAN
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
FLEMING v. USA
as 1:2024cv00979
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVID FLEMING and MICHAEL ZAHIR DAVID FLEMING SCOTT EL
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
USA v. Jabar Evans
as 24-2156
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JABAR EVANS, also known as JB, also known as Hood
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
