Cases 11 - 20 of 459,388
Johnson v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv05017
Plaintiff:
Vallary Johnson
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilson v. Horizon Therapeutics USA, Inc.
as 1:2024cv05010
Plaintiff:
Wayne Wilson
Defendant:
Horizon Therapeutics USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harrison v. Avlon Industries et al
as 1:2024cv05018
Plaintiff:
Gale Harrison
Defendant:
Avlon Industries, Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc., House of Cheatham LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Metheny v. USA
as 4:2024cv00060
Petitioner:
Taylor Metheny
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Blackman v. USA
as 0:2024cv02298
Petitioner:
Travon Lavelle Blackman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Kostohryz v. USA
as 0:2024cv02310
Petitioner:
Nicholas John Kostohryz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
USA v. $15,772.20 U.S. Currency
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$15,772.20 U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Barnhill v. USA
as 1:2024cv01018
Petitioner:
Sean M. Barnhill
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
DUNN et al v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2024cv00877
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL DUNN and CHERYL DUNN
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC., PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
