Cases filed in New York matching "USA"
Cases 1 - 10 of 459,388
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ESTES
as 2:2024cv00011
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: KATIE ESTES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Tyndall v. USA
as 3:2024cv00072
Petitioner: Richard Lee Tyndall, Jr.
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Scott v. USA
as 4:2024cv00517
Petitioner: Brandon Desha Scott
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Miranda v. Rexel USA, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv01044
Plaintiff: Raoul Miranda
Defendant: Rexel USA, INC. and Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Mheryan v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv05110
Plaintiff: Arsen Mheryan
Defendant: Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and Calstar Motors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Sahakyan v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC et al
as 2:2024cv05116
Plaintiff: Armen Sahakyan
Defendant: Mercedes-Benz USA LLC and Calstar Motors Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
We The Patriots USA, Inc. et al v. Doyle, Jr.
as 3:2024cv01054
Plaintiff: We The Patriots USA, Inc, Matthew Sherman and Brandon Tischer
Defendant: John P. Doyle, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22330
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Felton v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04987
Plaintiff: Irma Denise Felton
Defendant: Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fontenot v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04990
Plaintiff: Betty Fontenot
Defendant: Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc. and SoftSheen-Carson LLC,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?