Cases 81 - 90 of 832,323
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DataCloud Technologies, LLC v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
DataCloud Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
SECURE COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al
as 2:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
SECURE COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC.
Defendant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nuneviller v. Bud Bailey Apartment et al
as 2:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
Sara Michelle Nuneviller
Defendant:
Bud Bailey Apartment, Cydney Atkinson and Timothy S. Deans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Yu v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00425
Petitioner:
Henry Yu
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yasinov v. United States et al
as 7:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Igor Yasinov
Defendant:
United States, Bryant, Sgt. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Allen v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Crystal Marie Allen
Defendant:
Seven Jones, Timothy L. Sweeney, John Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gum v. City of Elkins et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Randall Gum
Defendant:
City of Elkins, Corporal Christopher Boatwright and Officer Noah G. Elbon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barber v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Paul Raymond Barber
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
