Cases 101 - 110 of 5,747
AppProved Software Corporation et al v. Sing et al
as 1:2024cv11325
Plaintiff:
AppProved Software Corporation and John Miller
Defendant:
Sunil Sing, Apple, Inc. and United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dodge et al v. Doe Creek Farm, Inc.
as 7:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Earl Dodge and Lauren Sheehan
Defendant:
Doe Creek Farm, Inc. doing business as Doe Creek Farm doing business as The Bad Apple
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RODGERS v. APPLE, INC.
as 2:2024cv06343
Plaintiff:
BRIAN RODGERS
Defendant:
APPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
DAINES et al v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv05359
Plaintiff:
TORY DAINES and SARAH BABB
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Apple v. NLRB
as 24-60242
Petitioner:
Apple, Incorporated
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Morrison v. University of Texas et al
as 3:2024cv01222
Plaintiff:
Susan D Morrison
Defendant:
University of Texas, State of Texas, Thomas Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morrison v. University of Texas et al
as 1:2024cv03494
Plaintiff:
Susan D. Morrison
Defendant:
University of Texas, State of Texas, Thomas Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
