Cases 81 - 90 of 842,939
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hicks v. Rutherford County Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv01195
Defendant:
Michael S. Fitzhugh, Rutherford County Sheriff's Office, f/n/u O'Rourke and others
Plaintiff:
Phelix L. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03767
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00807
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Trumbature v. Fletcher et al
as 2:2024cv00806
Defendant:
Dean Fowler, State of Texas, Marion County TX and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Trumbature
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Lattice Technologies LLC v. Vivint, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00803
Plaintiff:
Lattice Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Vivint, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Lattice Technologies LLC v. ALERT 360 OPCO, INC.
as 2:2024cv00804
Plaintiff:
Lattice Technologies LLC
Defendant:
ALERT 360 OPCO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Lattice Technologies LLC v. ADT LLC
as 2:2024cv00805
Defendant:
ADT LLC
Plaintiff:
Lattice Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Jacques, Patrick v. J. Brown et al
as 7:2024cv00684
Defendant:
Lt. Brad Burn, S. Scott, Lt. Gayheart and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jacques
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Nucor Corporation v. Paragon Industries Inc
as 3:2024cv00182
Defendant:
Paragon Industries Inc
Plaintiff:
Nucor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
