Cases 111 - 120 of 628
CARR v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv20202
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
DIANNE CARR
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: W.R. Grace & Co, et al
as 19-8042
Not Yet Classified:
In re: WR GRACE & CO, et al.
Petitioner:
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO, et al, TRANSPORTATION INSURANCE CO and JEREMY B. CARR
GAY v. A.O. SMITH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2019cv01311
Defendant:
POWERMASTER PACIFIC PRODUCTS, ZURN INDUSTRIES, FLUOR CONSTRUCTORS INTERNATIONAL and others
Plaintiff:
CARL E. GAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shabazz v. Carr
as 1:2019cv01909
Defendant:
Vincent Carr
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Haqq Shabazz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01871
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
HEAD v. CARR et al
as 2:2019cv01246
Defendant:
STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA, JR., MICHAEL D. ANDERSON, CHARLES R. CARR, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HEAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Warren et al
as 1:2019cv01698
Defendant:
C.O. McCoy, C.O. Brennon, John Doe (1) and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARR v. COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2019cv01133
Defendant:
QUINTON BULLOCK and COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Plaintiff:
DANIEL M. CARR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARR et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv20221
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., MCKESSON CORP and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
BRENDA CARR and BOBBY CARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY v. DOE
as 2:2019cv15582
Plaintiff:
MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
