Cases 21 - 30 of 6,516
TIMBERLAKE v. KLINEFELTER et al
as 3:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
ANTUAN TIMBERLAKE
Defendant:
SCOTT KLINEFELTER, DAVID J. CLOSE, JAMES JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STEVENS v. THE NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPT. et al
as 3:2024cv06290
Plaintiff:
CALVIN T. STEVENS
Defendant:
THE NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPT., CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, MAURICE FINNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Biden Administration et al
as 1:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
Joshua Anthony Jones
Defendant:
Biden Administration, Department of Justice, Senator Bob Casey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
JONES v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv02116
Plaintiff:
ALVIA ZIA JONES
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Hopkins v. Emig et al
as 1:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Derek Hopkins
Defendant:
Brian Emig, Racquel Hosten-Jones and Monroe Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
JONES v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv06053
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY JONES
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON AND JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CASTLE et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv06090
Plaintiff:
MARY JANE CASTLE and BRANDI BALDWIN-JONES
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and KENVUE INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
JONES v. DODSON et al
as 1:2024cv06105
Plaintiff:
MALIK S. JONES
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER J. DODSON, JAMES HERBERT, JAMES BARRETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
