Cases 21 - 30 of 109
Frederick Banks v. Postmasters of Pittsburgh, et al
as 19-1337
Defendant / Appellee:
MAILROOM SUPERVISOR, Allegheny County Jail, DEMMIL WALKER, U.S. Marshall, KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
KEEFE v. SETTEMBRINO et al
as 3:2019cv00121
Defendant:
MIDDLETOWN TOWNSHIP N.J., MAYOR KEVIN M. SETTEMBRINO, MIDDLETOWN POLICE and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD D. KEEFE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
KEEFE v. CORZINE et al
as 3:2019cv00162
Defendant:
RONALD D. KEEFE, JON CORZINE, ALL MEMBERS OF PRESENT SENATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURNS et al v. FEMIANI et al
as 1:2018cv00391
Defendant:
ERIE INSURANCE GROUP, ENCOMPASS INSURANCE, THE PA STATE POLICE, STATE OF PA and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. BURNS and KAREN K. BURNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS et al v. POSTMASTER et al
as 2:2018cv01604
Defendant:
KEEFE, DAVID ANDERCHAK, ORLANDO HARPER and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS, WITCRAFT RIDDLER and SHOOTER DUCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TALBERT v. KEEFE GROUP
as 2:2018cv05111
Defendant:
KEEFE GROUP
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv15271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
KEEFE v. KEEFE et al
as 3:2018cv14512
Defendant:
MONMOUTH COUNTY, REGINA SAUTER, JAY SILVESTER and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD KEEFE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOCKETT v. WILKINSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2018cv01213
Defendant:
RESOTRI, PATRICK KINAVEY, ALLEGHENY COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
RANDALL E. HOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RUBIN v. SOLEBURY TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2018cv02103
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HARRISON RUBIN
Defendant:
SOLEBURY TOWNSHIP, MICHAEL RODGERS, SOLEBURY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
