Cases 41 - 50 of 382
Caprice Justice Williams v. Total Longterm Care, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv01180
Plaintiff:
Caprice Justice Williams
Defendant:
Total Longterm Care, Inc., Innovage California Pace-Inland Empire, LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
JONES v. HICKSON et al
as 2:2022cv02541
Plaintiff:
RONALD JONES
Defendant:
MALIK HICKSON, BRAD THORNTON and THE TRUMBULL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Thompson v. CCA
as 2:2022cv01047
Plaintiff:
Kyle M Thompson and Kyle Matthew Thompson
Defendant:
CCA, CAFCC, A Hickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. v. NLRB
as 22-2027
Petitioner:
SUNBELT RENTALS, INC.
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
HICKSON v. PECO ENERGY
as 2:2022cv02053
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HICKSON
Defendant:
PECO ENERGY, PUC, GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kinnee v. TEI Biosciences Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00604
Plaintiff:
Michelle Kinnee
Defendant:
TEI Biosciences Inc., Integra Lifesciences Corporation, Lifesciences Sales LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pl Fed. Question: Product Liability
NLRB v. Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.
as 22-1700
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
SUNBELT RENTALS, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed Diversity-Employment Discrimination
HICKSON v. JONES et al
as 2:2022cv01171
Plaintiff:
MALIK HICKSON
Defendant:
RONALD J JONES, SR and BRAD THORNTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Michael Hickson v. Warden, Ridgeland Correctional Institution
as 22-6253
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL HICKSON
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, RIDGELAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
