Cases 51 - 60 of 564
LAWRENCE v. THE WIRELESS EXPERIENCE OF PA, INC.
as 2:2022cv00482
Plaintiff:
SETH LAWRENCE
Defendant:
THE WIRELESS EXPERIENCE OF PA, INC. doing business as WIRELESS EXPERIENCE
WHITFIELD v. CASTLIGHT HEALTH, INC et al
as 2:2022cv00421
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
CASTLIGHT HEALTH, INC, BRYAN ROBERTS, ED PARK and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
CULMER v. SCI - HOUTZDALE et al
as 3:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE LAMONT CULMER
Defendant:
SCI - HOUTZDALE, SETH DANIEL BURGGRAF, OFFICER YACKULICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FERGUSON v. HOLLOMAN CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv01832
Plaintiff:
SETH FERGUSON
Defendant:
HOLLOMAN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SETH-MURRAY v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2021cv05555
Petitioner:
OSCAR SETH-MURRAY
Respondent:
SECRETARY GEORGE LITTLE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv20325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
RUSH et al v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00316
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. RUSH, RAHIEM FANT, JORDAN BATTY, SR. and others
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL and DEREK F. OBERLANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dellaria v. Hershey Medical Center et al
as 1:2021cv01718
Plaintiff:
Michael Dellaria
Defendant:
Hershey Medical Center, Dr. Kimberly Neely, Dr. Seth Pantanelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHARIFI v. COUNTY OF MERCER et al
as 3:2021cv18097
Plaintiff:
PARASTU SHARIFI
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MERCER, TOWNSHIP OF EAST WINDSOR, EAST WINDSOR MUNICIPAL COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
