Cases 61 - 70 of 397
Krishna Mote v. James Murtin, et al
as 20-1466
Defendant / Appellee:
TROOPER POWELL, TROOPER PETER SALERNO, DETECTIVE JACK GILL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KRISHNA MOTE
Defendant:
TROOPER JAMES W. MURTIN and TROOPER JACK GILL
Desmond v. Klopp et al
as 1:2020cv00135
Defendant:
Justin Atherholt, John Doe, Michael Stafford and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Desmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Phillips v. Derek Oberlander, et al
as 20-1141
Defendant:
NURSE MURRAY, LIEUTENANT A. FRIEDLINE, CAPTAIN CARTER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS CLAY PHILLIPS
Mote v. Murtin et al
as 3:2020cv00092
Defendant:
Detective Jack Gill, Trooper Matthew Tredor, Trooper Barry Brinser and others
Plaintiff:
Krishna Mote
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PHILLIPS v. OBERLANDER et al
as 1:2019cv00382
Defendant:
NURSE MURRAY, LIEUTENANT S.A. GATTO, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER RUSSELL and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS CLAY PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
COOMES v. ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOT, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv05952
Defendant:
PARK PALAIS LLC, ANN CLARY GORDON, ESQ., SHAPIRO SHER and others
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH COOMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lavond HillIn re: Lavond Hill
as 19-3844
Not Yet Classified:
ALICIA BERGER, PUSHKALAI PILLAI, GREENE SCI, C/O Hollowood and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05798
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOMES v. BROWN et al
as 2:2019cv05244
Defendant:
ANN CLARY GORDON, ESQ., SHAPIRO SHER, SHAPIRO SHER GUINOT & SANDLER, P.A. and others
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH COOMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GILL v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv19605
Defendant:
MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and ASTRAZENECA LP
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA GILL
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
