Cases 61 - 70 of 380
STASZAK et al v. ASTON et al
as 2:2021cv03297
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH A. STASZAK and SHANNON FARLEY STASZAK
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTON, MT.PLEASANT MEDICAL, INC. and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
SAFANDA v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 2:2021cv13821
Plaintiff:
BARBARA A. SAFANDA
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7402
GONZALEZ et al v. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 2:2021cv02272
Plaintiff:
ILONKA GONZALEZ and JUAN GONZALEZ, JR.
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
AL HAYEK et al v. MNUCHIN et al
as 2:2020cv06164
Defendant:
STEVEN T. MNUCHIN, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, CHARLES P. RETTIG and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE TOMLIN, AMENA KIWAN, ANIL GILL and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00137
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
GRAHAM et al v. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 2:2021cv01411
Plaintiff:
ANDRE DAVIS, WYKEEM BASS, ROLAND GRAHAM and others
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7402
Lewis v. Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2021cv00517
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Lewis
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TALBERT v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 3:2021cv00750
Petitioner:
Charles Talbert
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arthur Bedrosian v. IRS
as 21-1583
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR BEDROSIAN
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
TALBERT v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 2:2021cv01865
Petitioner:
CHARLES TALBERT
Respondent:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
