Cases 61 - 70 of 239
Jonah Germany v. Warden Dauphin County Jail, et al
as 21-2538
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONAH GERMANY
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN DAUPHIN COUNTY JAIL and MIKE BOND, CEO of Prime Care Medical
MCCAULLEY v. CAMBRIA COUNTY PRISON et al
as 3:2021cv00128
Plaintiff:
DAVID MCCAULLEY
Defendant:
CAMBRIA COUNTY PRISON and PRIME CARE MEDICAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Krause v. Prime Care Medical
as 1:2021cv01182
Plaintiff:
Mark Krause
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HISEL v. LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00935
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. HISEL
Defendant:
LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTIONS and PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BREHM v. JOHNSTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2021cv00121
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER SHANE BREHM
Defendant:
JOHNSTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT, DETECTIVE BRADLEY CRIST, THE CITY OF JOHNSTOWN OF PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VIRGO v. SHABAZZ et al
as 5:2021cv02518
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN, DOUG WILLIAMS, ALLENTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
VIRGILLIO VIRGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLLIDAY v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL et al
as 5:2021cv00314
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOLLIDAY
Defendant:
NURSE LEONA, DR KENNETH WLOCHESKI and PRIME CARE MEDICAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HISEL v. LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00117
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. HISEL
Defendant:
LAWRENCE COUNTY CORRECTIONS and PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HURDLE v. RUSSELL et al
as 5:2021cv00172
Defendant:
DR. MOLLY LONGACHER, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, KYLE RUSSELL and others
Plaintiff:
RAMELL S. HURDLE and RAMELL SCOTT HURDLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Warren v. Prime Care Medical Inc, et al
as 20-3561
Defendant:
THOMAS C. CREIGHTON, III, LISA SCHELLER, COUNTY OF LEHIGH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBORAH WILSON, CARL HOFFMAN, JR., REBECCA F. DAVIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL WARREN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
