Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Steven Karpinski v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and BHCS, et al
as 23-3188
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN JAMES KARPINSKI
Defendant / Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND BHCS, WELLPATH, medical provider, ERIC TICE, Superintendent and others
SALEEM v. METZ et al
as 2:2023cv01128
Plaintiff:
NASIR SALEEM
Defendant:
K. METZ, SMITH, SCI GREENE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KARPINSKI v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND BHCS et al
as 3:2021cv00221
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JAMES KARPINSKI
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND BHCS, WELLPATH, ERIC TICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ELK v. KARPINSKI et al
as 1:2021cv02491
Plaintiff:
AL ELK and AL T. ELK
Defendant:
JARED M BOYD, KIMBERLY KARPINSKI, BRENNAN F SULLIVAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KARPINSKI v. LUNN
as 2:2014cv05601
Plaintiff:
EDWARD KARPINSKI
Defendant:
JEANNE M. LUNN, ROSE REDDEN and CHI RESTAURANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRADSHAW v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2014cv05583
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY BRADSHAW
Defendant:
MIKE WENEROWICZ, GEORGE ONDREJK, SUE KARPINSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWENS v. EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2014cv02689
Plaintiff:
MONTEZ M. BOWENS
Defendant:
EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN WETEL, KLOPOTOSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Request from Poland
as 1:2013mc00118
Petitioner:
USA
Respondent:
Karpinski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
