Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Derrick Allen, Sr. v. SunTrust Bank
as 20-1921
Defendant / Appellee:
SUNTRUST BANK, TRUIST BANK, BETH BARHAM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK MICHAEL ALLEN, SR.
ALLEN, SR v. SUNTRUST BANK et al
as 1:2020cv00293
Defendant:
BETH BARHAM, TRUIST BANK, SUNTRUST BANK and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK MICHAEL ALLEN, SR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Janet Valluzzi v. Alex Azar, II
as 20-1287
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, U.S. Department of Heath and Human Services
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANET L. VALLUZZI
Rhonda Kirschmann v. State of Virginia
as 19-2335
Defendant / Appellee:
CHESAPEAKE CIRCUIT COURT, NANCY PARR, Commonwealth's Attorney for the City of Chesapeake, SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RHONDA KIRSCHMANN, and those similarly situated
Cecil Truman v. Mr. Frye
as 19-7265
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. FARLEY, Correctional Officer, MR. MCDOUGAL, Correctional Officer and MR. FRYE, Sergeant
Defendant:
MR. HEATH, Magistrate
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CECIL GUY TRUMAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Application of Sasha Digiulian and John Charles Digiulian for an Order under 28 U.S. C. Sec. 1782 to take Discovery from the Johns Hopkins Heath System Corporation
as 8:2019cv02213
Respondent:
The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation
Petitioner:
Sasha Digiulian and John Charles Digiulian
In Re:
Application of Sasha Digiulian and John Charles Digiulian for an Order under 28 U.S. C. Sec. 1782 to take Discovery from the Johns Hopkins Heath System Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
