Cases 91 - 100 of 49,426
Taylor v. Giant of Maryland LLC et al
as 8:2024cv01561
Plaintiff:
Dr Wilhelmina Taylor
Defendant:
Giant of Maryland LLC and Cheryl Travers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Adaeze Nwosu v. Karla Smith
as 24-1486
Plaintiff:
ADAEZE NWOSU
Defendant:
KARLA SMITH, KEVIN HESSLER, MICHAEL MCAULIFFE and others
JONES v. THE CITY OF GREENSBORO et al
as 1:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN ROBERT JONES
Defendant:
THE CITY OF GREENSBORO and GREENSBORO FIRE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Talley v. Department of the Army
as 3:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Courtney D. Talley
Defendant:
Department of the Army, United States of America and Virginia Commonwealth University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Harr v. North Carolina Judicial Standards Commission
as 5:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Sidney B. Harr
Defendant:
North Carolina Judicial Standards Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Intrepid Paralegal Solutions, LLC et al v. Ziperman et al
as 1:2024cv01554
Plaintiff:
Intrepid Paralegal Solutions, LLC and Daniel Manoff
Defendant:
Philip Ziperman and Anthony Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
