Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 135,132
Jones v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00079
Petitioner: Charles W. Jones
Respondent: United States of America and Warden of FCI Beckley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Oxendine v. Warden of Evans C.I.
as 2:2024cv03716
Petitioner: Steven W. Oxendine
Respondent: Warden of Evans C.I.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Slack v. USA
as 3:2024cv00600
Petitioner: William Kivett Slack
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Davis v. Aiken County Sheriffs Office et al
as 8:2024cv03712
Plaintiff: Jefferey Lurvern Davis, Sr.
Defendant: Aiken County Sheriffs Office and Southern Health Partners, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Wrongful Death
LAFOND v. USA
as 1:2024cv00540
Petitioner: RAOUL LAFOND
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
William McCladdie v. Warden of Evans Correctional Institution
as 24-6622
Petitioner: WILLIAM HERBERT MCCLADDIE
Respondent: WARDEN OF EVANS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Harper v. Harrison et al
as 5:2024ct03160
Plaintiff: Terek Harper
Defendant: Jodi Harrison and Shannon Eames
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randolph McDowell v. State of Maryland
as 24-6624
Petitioner: RANDOLPH MCDOWELL
Respondent: STATE OF MARYLAND, BALTIMORE CITY CIRCUIT COURT and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
White v. Stirling et al
as 4:2024cv03689
Plaintiff: Larry James Tyler
Defendant: Alan Wilson and James Hudson, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weddington v. Patuxent Institution et al
as 1:2024cv01887
Plaintiff: Robert C. Weddington
Defendant: Patuxent Institution and Sgt. Dawn Hasley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?