Cases 51 - 60 of 1,282
Linder v. Brown et al
as 3:2023cv00564
Plaintiff:
Kevin Maurice Linder
Defendant:
Donald G Brown, FNU Luna, FNU Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Linder v. Brown et al
as 5:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Kevin Maurice Linder
Defendant:
Donald G Brown, FNU Luna, FNU Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Jackson v. Tammy Williams
as 23-6856
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD C. JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
TAMMY WILLIAMS, Warden of DFCC, MARK ENGELKE, Director of Food Service and NATARCHA GREGG, State Dietician
MORGAN v. USA
as 1:2023cv00741
Petitioner:
DONALD RAY MORGAN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Cox v. Ames
as 2:2023cv00577
Petitioner:
Christopher Cox
Respondent:
Donald F. Ames
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rembold v. Bohrer et al
as 1:2023cv02348
Petitioner:
Donald G. Rembold
Respondent:
William S. Bohrer, Warden of MCTC and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nicholas Robey v. Donald Ames
as 23-6790
Petitioner / Appellant:
NICHOLAS ROBEY
Respondent / Appellee:
DONALD F. AMES, Superintendent, Mount Olive Correctional Complex
Reynolds v. Warden, FCI Beckley
as 5:2023cv00533
Petitioner:
Donald Reynolds
Respondent:
DSCC, FCI Beckley, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bias et al v. Skillet Catering Service
as 3:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
Michael Spencer Bias, Daniel Hinson, Kenneth Peyton and others
Defendant:
Skillet Catering Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khan v. Bailey
as 1:2023cv02164
Petitioner:
Donald Khan
Respondent:
Warden William Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
