Cases 11 - 20 of 40
ROBINSON v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00133
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. , JOSHUA ROLLINS , A.M. GOINS and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONY JAMES ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. CITY OF BURLINGTON et al
as 1:2016cv00963
Plaintiff:
ANNA MARIE MARTIN
Defendant:
CITY OF BURLINGTON , HAROLD T OWEN , HARDIN WATKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eve Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
as 16-1677
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EVE M. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P., BRENDA GREER and JAMES V. HARNEY, JR.
Defendant:
STEPHANIE C. FITZGERALD
King Grant-Davis v. Shane Fortune
as 15-2598
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KING GRANT-DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
SHANE FORTUNE, SCOTT BLIEMEISTER, JEROME BURGESS and others
Grant-Davis v. Fortune et al
as 2:2015cv04211
Plaintiff:
King Grant-Davis
Defendant:
Shane Fortune, Scott Bliemeister, Jerome Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores East L.P. et al
as 3:2015cv00387
Plaintiff:
Eve M. Davis
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East L.P. , Brenda Greer , James V. Harney, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spruill v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 4:2014cv00233
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cynthia A Spruill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Spruill v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00074
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cynthia A Spruill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Jones v. Wal-Mart Inc et al
as 0:2014cv04114
Plaintiff:
Marvin K Jones
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Inc, Sacramento Dept of Child Support Svcs and Automatic Data Processing Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv13024
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Cook and Shelley Louise Cook
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , Rudy Anthony and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
