Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Erwin v. Gaston County Department of Health & Human Services et al
as 3:2023cv00762
Plaintiff:
Kanisha Monique Latrice Erwin
Defendant:
Gaston County Department of Health & Human Services, Angela C. Karchmer, Tereasa L. Osborne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1978
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McDowell v. Tate
as 1:2022cv01435
Plaintiff:
Randolph McDowell
Defendant:
Gwendolyn S. Tate
Consolidated Defendant:
Shavette Conigland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
McDowell v. Tate et al
as 1:2022cv01436
Plaintiff:
Randolph McDowell
Defendant:
Gwendolyn S. Tate and Shavette Conigland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00094
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Radcliff v. The McDowell County Commission et al
as 1:2021cv00078
Defendant:
Aaron Cantrell, The McDowell County Commission, Jerry Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Radcliff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeWall v. McDowell County Commission et al
as 1:2020cv00227
Plaintiff:
Yoshua DeWall
Defendant:
Sgt. Aaron Cantrell, CO II Randy Lowe, McDowell County Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00528
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
McDowell v. The City of Baltimore et al
as 1:2019cv01611
Defendant:
Brain Murphy, David Young, Ivan Bates and others
Plaintiff:
Randolph McDowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv
Wilson v. Marion Police Department et al
as 1:2019cv00053
Defendant:
Mission McDowell Hospital, Marion Police Department, Marion Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Sue Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
