General Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 31
SMALL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00169
Petitioner: STEPHEN ALLEN SMALL, JR.
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Small v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023cv00658
Petitioner: Suresh H. Small
Respondent: Warden Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Demetrius Smalls v. B. Stirling
as 22-6984
Petitioner / Appellant: DEMETRIUS JAROD SMALLS
Respondent / Appellee: DIRECTOR B. STIRLING and WARDEN K. SHARP
Smalls v. Warden of Lieber Correctional Institution We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv02060
Petitioner: Benjamin Smalls and Benjamin Lavon Smalls
Respondent: State of South Carolina and Warden of Lieber Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demetrius Smalls v. B. Stirling
as 22-6238
Petitioner / Appellant: DEMETRIUS JAROD SMALLS
Respondent / Appellee: DIRECTOR B. STIRLING and WARDEN K. SHARP
Anthony Smalls v. Jeff Nines We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-6180
Petitioner / Appellant: ANTHONY MAURICE SMALLS
Respondent / Appellee: ACTING WARDEN JEFF NINES and STATE OF MARYLAND
Smalls v. Stirling et al
as 2:2021cv02025
Petitioner: Demetrius Jarod Smalls
Respondent: Director B Stirling and Warden K Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smalls v. Nines et al
as 1:2021cv00458
Respondent: The State of Maryland and Jeffrey Nines
Petitioner: Anthony Maurice Smalls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smalls v. Nines et al
as 1:2020cv01884
Respondent: Acting Warden Jeff Nines and The State of Maryland
Petitioner: Anthony Maurice Smalls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vence Small v. Adams
as 1:2020cv00102
Respondent: Warden Adams
Petitioner: Vanessa Vence Small
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?