Cases 21 - 30 of 188
Brown v. Rodriguez et al
as 5:2022ct03063
Plaintiff:
Julious Brown
Defendant:
P.A. O. Rodriguez, P.A. A. Bart-Plange, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Chase v. Wilson
as 3:2022cv00092
Petitioner:
Richard J. Chase
Respondent:
R. Wilson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons / Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Powell v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2022ct03052
Plaintiff:
Raphael Davonne Powell
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, AUSP Thomson Administration, Mr. Stringer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Palacio v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2022ct03033
Plaintiff:
Mauro C. Palacio
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Williams v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Bud Pratt Williams
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hahn v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2021ct03386
Plaintiff:
Kris Hahn
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Williams v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 9:2021cv03951
Plaintiff:
Brandon Evan Williams
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 8:2021cv03484
Plaintiff:
Elan C. Lewis
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Stephen Hoey, Holly Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crowe v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2021ct03316
Plaintiff:
Patrick Crowe
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Witherspoon v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 5:2021ct03131
Defendant:
Tamara S. Lyn, Richard Engel, Warden Thomas Scarantino and others
Plaintiff:
Shontonio Witherspoon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
