Civil Rights Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 111
Elizabeth Sines v. Nathan Damigo
as 23-1122
Plaintiff / Appellee: ELIZABETH SINES, SETH WISPELWEY, MARISSA BLAIR and others
Plaintiff: TYLER MAGILL and HANNAH PEARCE
Defendant / Appellant: NATHAN DAMIGO
Defendant: JASON KESSLER, RICHARD SPENCER, CHRISTOPHER CANTWELL and others
Amicus Curiae: HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION, LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER, SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER and others
Elizabeth Sines v. Richard Spencer
as 23-1112
Plaintiff / Appellee: ELIZABETH SINES, SETH WISPELWEY, MARISSA BLAIR and others
Plaintiff: TYLER MAGILL and HANNAH PEARCE
Defendant / Appellant: RICHARD SPENCER
Defendant: JASON KESSLER, CHRISTOPHER CANTWELL, NATHAN DAMIGO and others
Goldman et al v. Youngkin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00789
Plaintiff: Paul Goldman, Tavorise Marks, Tamia Douglas and others
Defendant: Glenn Youngkin, Robert Brink, John O'Bannon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Turpin v. Youngkin et al
as 3:2022cv00735
Plaintiff: Cheryl Turpin
Defendant: Glenn Youngkin, L. Louise Lucas, Robert Brink and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345 Injunctive and Declaratory Relief
North Carolina Green Party v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
as 22-1830
Plaintiff / Appellee: NORTH CAROLINA GREEN PARTY, TONY NDEGE, MATTHEW HOH and others
Defendant: NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, CHAIR DAMON CIRCOSTA, in his official capacity as a member or employee of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, STELLA ANDERSON, in her official capacity as a member or employee of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE and NORTH CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Amicus Curiae: NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
DUNBAR v. ALI et al
as 1:2022cv00597
Plaintiff: JENNIFER DUNBAR
Defendant: ADDUL RAHMAN EL ALI, JACK LAMBERT, CLAY MAGUIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
North Carolina Green Party et al v. North Carolina State Board of Elections We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00276
Plaintiff: North Carolina Green Party, Tony Ndege, Matthew Hoh and others
Defendant: North Carolina State Board of Elections, Chair Damon Circosta, Stella Anderson and others
Intervenor Defendant: DSCC and North Carolina Democratic Party
Amicus Curiae: National Republican Senatorial Committee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
North Carolina Green Party et al v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
as 4:2022cv00078
Plaintiff: North Carolina Green Party, Tony Ndege, Matthew Hoh and others
Defendant: NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS
Intervenor Defendant: DSCC and North Carolina Democratic Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Cawthorn v. Circosta et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00050
Plaintiff: Madison Cawthorn
Defendant: DAMON CIRCOSTA, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHAIRMAN OF THE NC STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, STELLA ANDERSON, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE NC BOARD OF ELECTIONS, JEFF CARMON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MEMBER OF THE NC STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Interested Party: Barbara Lynn Amalfi, Laurel Ashton, Natalie Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Democratic Party of Virginia et al v. Brink et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00756
Plaintiff: Democratic Party of Virginia and DCCC
Defendant: Robert H. Brink, Christopher E. Piper, Jamilah D. Lecruise and others
Amicus Curiae: Public Interest Legal Foundation
Intervenor Defendant: Republican Party of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?