Cases 11 - 20 of 703
Hairston v. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals et al
as 3:2024cv00438
Defendant:
District Court Martinburg WV, Judge Heytens, Judge King and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur L. Hairston, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. Attorney General
as 24-1514
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.
Marshall et al v. Town Of Bladensburg Maryland et al
as 8:2024cv01549
Defendant:
Ty Tinsley, Alicia Villanueva, Henry Arriola and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Marshall and Maria Day-Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1443
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2
EFIRD v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY SHERIFF SAMUEL SCOTT PAGE et al
as 1:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Kyle, Estate of Kepley and MELISSA EFIRD
Defendant:
Rockingham County Sheriff Samuel Scott Page, Southern Health Partners, Inc., M.D. ELTON J. AMOS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Guess v. Brown, as Richland County Administrator et al
as 3:2024cv01797
Plaintiff:
Thurmond Guess, Sr.
Defendant:
Leonardo Brown, Darrell Jackson, Sr., Rose Ann English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
