Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv00957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Johnson v. McDowell County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2017cv04404
Plaintiff:
James A. Johnson
Defendant:
McDowell County Sheriff Department and Ron Blevins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Brown et al
as 1:2017cv01351
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Williams
Defendant:
Judy Brown, Theresa McDowell, Betty Glaskco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pollard v. Brown et al
as 1:2017cv01352
Plaintiff:
Ann L. Pollard
Defendant:
Judy Brown, Betty Glascok, Theresa McDowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDowell v. Grimes et al
as 1:2017cv03200
Plaintiff:
Brenda McDowell
Defendant:
Charles Grimes , Anthony Batts and Baltimore City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Randy Thomas v. Ronald Chapman
as 17-2185
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY L. THOMAS, and as Father, Next of Friend, Natural Guardian, and on behalf of A.T.T.
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD L. CHAPMAN, In his Official and Personal Capacity, CHRISTY T. MANN, Judge, In her Official and Personal Capacity, GEORGE E. BATTLE, III, In his Official and Personal Capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-2034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-2028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brooks v. Freeman et al
as 1:2016cv05272
Plaintiff:
Shiann Brooks
Defendant:
Robert Ryan Freeman , McDowell County Sheriff's Department and McDowell County Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
