Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Bey et al
as 3:2014cv00511
Plaintiff:
Akil R. Bey and Katina Bowers-Graves
Defendant:
Sharon Gregory Jacobs, Marilynn C. Goss, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe 2 v. Burke County Board of Education
as 1:2013cv00300
Defendant:
Burke County Board of Education
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP et al v. MCCRORY et al
as 1:2013cv00658
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP , ROSANELL EATON , JOHN DOE 1 and others
Defendant:
PATRICK LLOYD MCCRORY, KIM WESTBROOK STRACH , JOSHUA B. HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Owusu v. United States of America et al
as 8:2012cv02326
Plaintiff:
Alexander Owusu
Defendant:
United States of America, Robert S. Mueller, III, Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00169
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Marshall v. Purcell et al
as 2:2012cv00084
Plaintiff:
Bradley R Marshall
Defendant:
Stephen L Purcell, Jennifer Gee, United States Department of Labor, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mantooth v. Mullins et al
as 7:2011cv02467
Plaintiff:
Robert Marcel Mantooth
Defendant:
Kathy Trent Mullins, Laura A Mantooth, Mitzi L Sweet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. Milam et al
as 1:2011cv00097
Plaintiff:
Tori Lakisha Day
Defendant:
Russell B. Milam , John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rutledge v. Hooters of America, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00608
Plaintiff:
Merle T. Rutledge, Jr.
Defendant:
Hooters of America, Inc., Hooters Restaurant, Shawn Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
