Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02870
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2079
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Ronald I. Paul v. SC Dept. of Transportation
as 17-1057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD I. PAUL
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, PAUL D. DE HOLCZER, individually and as a partner of the law firm of Moses, Koon & Brackett, PC, MICHAEL H. QUINN, individually and as senior lawyer of Quinn Law Firm, LLC and others
Daly et al v. Tennant et al
as 3:2016cv08981
Plaintiff:
Naomi Spencer Daly and Darrell Castle
Defendant:
Natalie Tennant and Brian Wood
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Dorrel W. Arthur
Amicu:
American Civil Liberties Union of West Virginia Foundation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-2034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Paul v. South Carolina Department of Transportations et al
as 3:2016cv01727
Plaintiff:
Ronald I Paul
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Transportations, Paul D de Holczer, Michael H Quinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darrell Harris v. Police Nathan Ulmer
as 16-1592
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL P. HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
POLICE NATHAN ULMER, in both his official and individual capacity as a Police of the Baltimore City Police Department and SERGEANT NATALIE PRESTON, in both her official and individual capacity as a Police of the Baltimore City Police Department
Defendant:
BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANTHONY W. BATTS, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Baltimore City Police Department, 6 UNKNOWN POLICE & K9 DOG, in both their official and individual capacity as a Police of the Baltimore City Police Department and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ronald Paul v. Paul de Holczer
as 15-2059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD I. PAUL
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL D. DE HOLCZER, individually and as a partner of the law firm of Moses, Koon & Brackett, PC, MICHAEL H. QUINN, individually and as senior lawyer of Quinn Law Firm, LLC, J. CHARLES ORMOND, JR., individually and as partner of the Law Firm of Holler, Dennis, Corbett, ,Ormond, Plante & Garner and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
