Civil Rights Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 160
Smith v. Domestic Relations of Charleston County et al
as 2:2018cv02297
Defendant: Judge Dana A Morris and Domestic Relations of Charleston County
Plaintiff: Theon Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00063
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv00269
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Morris v. Horsley et al
as 2:2018cv00287
Plaintiff: Leah-Anne Morris
Defendant: Deja Horsley, Kermesha Henderson, Lacora Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hamstead v. West Virginia State Police et al
as 3:2018cv00079
Plaintiff: Julie Ann Hamstead
Defendant: West Virginia State Police , D.R. Walker , The City of Ranson, West Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00018
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04591
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Solo El v. Morris et al
as 3:2017cv00837
Plaintiff: Sehven Arcamedes Solo El
Defendant: Kimberly Morris, "ROXIE" LNU, FNU Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv03051
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
NANCE,et al v. MOODY, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00957
Plaintiff: HUNTER NANCE , DONNA NANCE and RODNEY NANCE
Defendant: LYNN MOODY , ROWAN SALISBURY BOARD OF EDUCATION , KELLY WITHERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?