Cases 71 - 80 of 94
Thomas v. Chapman et al
as 5:2011cv00694
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Thomas
Defendant:
Ronald L. Chapman, Christy T. Mann, George E. Battle, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Hall v. Lord et al
as 1:2012cv01037
Plaintiff:
Tonita Louise Hall
Defendant:
Albert L. Lord, Debra Wiley, John Frey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kyle v. U.S. Department of Education
as 1:2012cv01639
Plaintiff:
Samuel B. Kyle
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Randy Thomas v. Ronald Chapman
as 12-1269
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY L. THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD L. CHAPMAN, In his Official and Personal Capacity, CHRISTY T. MANN, Judge, In her Official and Personal Capacity, GEORGE E. BATTLE, III, In his Official and Personal Capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CAM Construction Co., Inc. v. Baltimore City Board of School
as 11-2108
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CAM CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
Defendant:
BALTIMORE CITY BOARD OF SCHOOL COMMISSIONERS, BALTIMORE CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, ANDRES A. ALONSO, Chief Executive Officer of the Baltimore City Public School System and others
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellant:
ROY KIRBY & SONS, INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.