Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Bruno Mpoy v. State of Maryland
as 24-1474
Plaintiff:
BRUNO K. MPOY, Individually and as a Next Friend of T.M. and C.M.
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND, MARCY WAXMAN and others
Pruitt v. Carpenter
as 6:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
Andrea Pruitt
Defendant:
Rebekah Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Mpoy v. The State of Maryland et al
as 8:2023cv01927
Plaintiff:
Bruno K. Mpoy
Defendant:
The State of Maryland, Montgomery County, Maryland, Marcy Waxman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ross Abbott v. Harris Pastides
as 17-1853
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROSS ABBOTT, COLLEGE LIBERTARIANS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA and YOUNG AMERICANS FOR LIBERTY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRIS PASTIDES, DENNIS PRUITT, BOBBY GIST and others
Williams et al v. Wilson et al
as 1:2017cv01583
Plaintiff:
James Arnold Williams, Jr., Queen Anne's County Property Owners and Property Owners of the United States of America
Defendant:
Stephen K. Wilson, Van T. Mitchell, State of Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
