Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Brett v. Biden et al
as 3:2023cv00533
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Jill Biden, Attorney General Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Folse v. Kanawha County Commission et al
as 2:2022cv00435
Plaintiff:
Jay Folse
Defendant:
Kanawha County Commission, Vera McCormick, Lin Tech International, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson et al v. Warner et al
as 3:2019cv00898
Defendant:
Mac Warner and Vera McCormick
Plaintiff:
Dakota Nelson, West Virginia Democratic House Legislative Committee, West Virginia Democratic Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Black v. McCormick et al
as 3:2019cv00581
Defendant:
Penny McCormick and James McCormick
Plaintiff:
Russell Allen Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCormick v. The Housing Authority of Baltimore City
as 1:2019cv02415
Defendant:
The Housing Authority of Baltimore City
Plaintiff:
Charlene A. McCormick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00542
Consolidated Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RANKIN v. SYKES et al
as 1:2018cv00550
Plaintiff:
NIGEL MARQUELL RANKIN
Defendant:
RUFFIN SYKES, MARTIN MCGHEE, SUSAN S. FRYE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
