Cases 1 - 10 of 525
Armstrong v. North Carolina et al
as 5:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
North Carolina, Quentin T. Sumner and Rachel Joyner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF GREENSBORO and KOURY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Casanova v. Pfizer and Affiliates et al
as 3:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
Ashley Casanova
Defendant:
Pfizer and Affiliates, Actalent Temporary Agency and Affiliates, GRAIL INC. and Affiliates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Shephard v. Diamond et al
as 7:2024cv00244
Petitioner:
Charles O. Shephard
Respondent:
Alexander Diamond, Patricia Diamond, Guy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Shephard v. Diamond et al
as 3:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Charles O. Shephard
Defendant:
Alexander Diamond, Patricia Diamond, Guy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Jones v. McDonough et al
as 8:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Terris R. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Denis McDonough, George M. Morris, Jennifer White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ARMSTRONG v. NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA and KOURY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armstrong v. Sumner
as 5:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
Quentin T. Sumner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
