Cases 1 - 10 of 117
ARMSTRONG v. NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA and KOURY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armstrong v. Sumner
as 5:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
Quentin T. Sumner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armstrong v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2023cv00871
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia and Emporia Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armstrong v. Cooper et al
as 5:2023cv00719
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
Roy Cooper and Quentin T. Sumner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Dingle v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2023cv04141
Plaintiff:
Eugene Dingle
Defendant:
Leslie Armstrong and Tim Mose
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
ARMSTRONG v. NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2023cv00642
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA and ACE TOWING AND RECOVERY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curtis Wells, Jr. v. Javier Fuentes
as 23-1638
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS LEVAR WELLS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JAVIER FUENTES, Badge #1666, SCOTT WANEK, Badge #1137, MICHAEL P. ARMSTRONG, Badge #331 and others
ARMSTRONG v. NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF DURHAM and CJ DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2023cv00380
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA and KOURY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
