Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Marcus Adams v. City of Norfolk
as 24-6011
Plaintiff:
MARCUS E. ADAMS
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NORFOLK, ROBERT FORD, officially and individually, BRENT ARTHUR JOHNSON, officially and individually and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00544
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Donehue et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2012cv01965
Petitioner:
Wesley Donehue and Butch Bowers
Plaintiff:
South Carolina, State of
Defendant:
United States of America and Eric H Holder, Jr
Intervenor_defendant:
James Debose, Junior Glover, Family Unit Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Long v. Floyd et al
as 5:2012cv01099
Plaintiff:
Jerome Long
Defendant:
Joel Floyd, James C Williams, Barbar Walters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dawson v. Bodison et al
as 2:2011cv01779
Plaintiff:
Russell Dawson
Defendant:
McKither Bodison, Fred B Thompson, Ralph A Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mauney v. Williams et al
as 1:2009cv01230
Plaintiff:
Fred Woodrow Mauney, Jr.
Defendant:
David C. Williams, United States Postal Service and Gordon J. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Taylor et al
as 1:2008cv01794
Plaintiff:
Melvina C. Williams
Defendant:
Taylor, Baltimore City Police Department and Mayor & City Council of Baltimore
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
