Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00805
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Dineen Etienne v. Machelle Sanders
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
MACHELLE SANDERS, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Administration; North Carolina Department of Commerce, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL, Division Executive Director, Historically Underutilized Businesses, BENNY SLOAN, DBW Certification Officer, North Carolina Department of Transportation and others
Jane Doe v. James Dewees
as 23-1550
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES T. DEWEES, Sheriff of Carroll County, BEN CRAFT, Deputy Sheriff, DOUGLAS KRIETE, Deputy Sheriff and others
Etienne v. Sanders et al
as 5:2023cv00214
Respondent:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Petitioner:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
Reserve at Carrington Place
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01873
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Ipock v. Hughes et al
as 4:2021cv00099
Plaintiff:
Chad Ipock
Defendant:
Fred Hughes, III, Jerry Monette, Lee Roy Thomas, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
El-Bey v. Hampton, VA et al
as 4:2019cv00126
Defendant:
Hampton, VA, Gregory Simms and Unknown city Contractor John Doe towing
Plaintiff:
Karl Burden El-Bey
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00520
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
