Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Marshall v. Prince et al
as 1:2024cv00605
Defendant:
Renique Riley-Spiller, Sonya Prince, Dorothy Riley and others
Plaintiff:
LaShonda Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
VOE et al v. MANSFIELD et al
as 1:2023cv00864
Plaintiff:
VICTOR VOE, VANESSA VOE, VANCE VOE and others
Defendant:
THOMAS MANSFIELD, MICHAUX R. KILPATRICK, MD, PHD, CHRISTINE M. KHANDELWAL, DO and others
Intervenor Defendant:
PHILIP E. BERGER and TIMOTHY K. MOORE
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Pugh v. Coleman et al
as 2:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Ethan Pugh
Defendant:
Michael Sean Coleman, April Riley, Steven Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
v. Kamara et al
as 2:2023cv02335
Plaintiff:
Rosamond Kamara
Defendant:
Charleston School of Law, Ed Bell, Nicholas Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Biro v. Flynn et al
as 4:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Riley Dyson Biro
Defendant:
Timothy Flynn, Tavis Henry, Mike Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1475
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
