Cases 1 - 10 of 276
Murphy v. Barron et al
as 1:2024cv02666
Plaintiff:
Kevin Donnell Murphy
Defendant:
Ruth Shuman, Erek L. Barron, Megan L. Micco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00635
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Rivera v. Hudson et al
as 2:2024cv00518
Defendant:
Stephanie Hudson, Detective William Baker, WAVY News 10 and others
Plaintiff:
Linwood Sr. Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Floyd-McInnis v. Horry County School District et al
as 4:2024cv04107
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Floyd-McInnis
Defendant:
Horry County School District and Thomas Michael Interlandi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Snead v. Dade
as 1:2024cv01799
Plaintiff:
Sharaa Snead
Defendant:
Stephany Dade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Casto Land, Inc. et al v. City of Huntington, West Virginia et al
as 3:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Jimmie L. Lapsley, Universal Holdings, LLC, Clifford Smith and others
Defendant:
City of Huntington, West Virginia, Steve Williams, Sherry Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01635
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Juanisha Brooks v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 24-1506
Defendant:
TROOPER ROBERT HINDENLANG, TROOPER STEPHANIE KAPUSTA and COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Plaintiff:
JUANISHA CHERIE BROOKS
Margaret Smith v. Stephanie McComas
as 24-1479
Defendant:
FEDERAL HOMELAND SECURITY, STATE HOMELAND SECURITY, STEPHANIE R. MCCOMAS and others
Plaintiff:
MARGARET JEAN SMITH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
