Cases 101 - 110 of 134,669
McKinney v. Hensel et al
as 5:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Joshua C. McKinney
Defendant:
James Hensel, III, Dr. James Beane, Carla Deem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaun Love v. Larry Edmonds
as 24-6521
Petitioner:
SHAUN MICHAEL LOVE
Respondent:
WARDEN LARRY EDMONDS
El-Bey v. Armstead et al
as 1:2024cv01562
Plaintiff:
Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
Laura Armstead, John Addison Howard, Lorelei Saftler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanchard v. Dunne et al
as 1:2024cv01577
Plaintiff:
Ray A. Blanchard
Defendant:
Steven M. Dunne, United States Probation Office, Supervisor and Melissa Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Lovett
as 5:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Damarcus Da'shaun Dixon
Defendant:
Mr. S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
ZABOROWSKI v. GOBBLE et al
as 1:2024cv00454
Petitioner:
CONRAD WILLIAM ZABOROWSKI
Respondent:
CANDACE GOBBLE and ALAMANCE COUNTY DSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McCoy v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 9:2024cv03256
Plaintiff:
Damaine McCoy
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Destined George v. Neeley
as 24-6524
Plaintiff:
DESTINED C. M. D. GEORGE
Defendant:
SARGENT NEELEY, LIEUTENANT WILLIAMS, LIEUTENANT FLEMING and others
Franks v. Jones
as 6:2024cv03232
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Franks
Defendant:
Mark A Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jones v. Charleston County et al
as 6:2024cv03237
Plaintiff:
Nekeya Jones
Defendant:
Charleston County, Charleston County Sheriff's Office, Wellpath LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
