Cases 11 - 20 of 415
Hunt v. Anderson
as 3:2024cv00202
Petitioner:
Floyd O. Hunt, Jr.
Respondent:
D. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunt v. Deleware Health et al
as 7:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Floyd O. Hunt, Jr.
Defendant:
Deleware Health and Social Services Division of Child Support
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ISHMAN v. SLOCUMB et al
as 1:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY W. ISHMAN
Defendant:
OFFICER SLOCUMB, LIEUTENANT THOMPSON, CAPTAIN THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ishman v. Slocumb et al
as 5:2024ct03055
Plaintiff:
Bradley W. Ishman
Defendant:
Officer Slocumb, Lieutenant Thompson, Captain Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. KERSEY et al
as 1:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
DEDRICK L. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
RALPH KERSEY, B.J. KNIGHT, KIM FOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. USA
as 5:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Dashawn Raquan Hunt
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hunt v. Ishee
as 5:2024hc02003
Petitioner:
Michael Eugene Hunt
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Antley v. Aiken County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2023cv06890
Plaintiff:
Derek Clark Antley
Defendant:
Aiken County Sheriff's Department, Andrew L. Busbee, Michael Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Woodson v. Dye et al
as 7:2023cv00817
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Harry Woodson, Jr.
Defendant:
Ms. T. Dye, Ms. Sater, Mr. Widener and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE v. KERSEY et al
as 1:2023cv01065
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTRANTRINO LEE
Defendant:
RALPH KERSEY, B.J. KNIGHT, KIM FOYE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
