Cases 11 - 20 of 167
DeGollado v. BOP
as 5:2023cv00239
Petitioner:
Jesus Alejandr DeGollado
Respondent:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cobble v. US Government et al
as 6:2023cv00648
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cobble, Johnathan Wayne Plemons, Daniel Castleberry and others
Defendant:
US Government, US BOP, US BOP Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
PULLIAM v. USA
as 1:2023cv00085
Petitioner:
JODY LEE PULLIAM, JR.
Respondent:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
GRIFFITH v. BOP
as 1:2023cv00062
Petitioner:
RICHARD LEE GRIFFITH
Respondent:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-7471
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Flack v. Streeval
as 7:2022cv00634
Petitioner:
Gregory W. Flack
Respondent:
BOP Warden J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kopp v. Ziolkowski et al
as 5:2022cv00391
Defendant:
J. Ziolkowski, Deacon Jay, Chaplain Weaver and others
Plaintiff:
James Charles Kopp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crowe v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022ct03320
Plaintiff:
Patrick Crowe
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Prisons (BOP), Brandon Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
JACOBS v. BOP et al
as 1:2022cv00726
Petitioner:
CORY LEE JACOBS
Respondent:
BOP and DOJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Crowe v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
Patrick Crowe
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Bureau of Prisons (BOP), Brandon Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
