Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Dillingham v. Clarke et al
as 2:2015cv00125
Plaintiff:
James H. Dillingham, III
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Wendall Pixley, Mr. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03079
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Taylor v. Ruebenstein et al
as 2:2013cv33339
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Taylor
Defendant:
Jim Ruebenstein , David Ballard , Paul Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corey Coles v. Ralph Northcutt and Spouse
as 14-6006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY COLES
Defendant - Appellee:
RALPH NORTHCUTT, Supervisor/Teacher, HAROLD CLARKE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, G. ROBINSON, Manager Ombudsman Service Unit and others
Taylor v. Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2013cv33391
Petitioner:
Gregory J. Taylor
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Taylor v. F.C.I. Butner 2 Administration
as 5:2013ct03319
Plaintiff:
Gregory J. Taylor
Defendant:
F.C.I. Butner 2 Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coles v. Ralph Northcutt et al., and Spouse et al
as 2:2012cv00630
Plaintiff:
Corey Coles
Defendant:
Ralph Northcutt et al., and Spouse, Harold Clarke and Spouse, G. Robinson and Spouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edward Jasper v. R. Deel
as 08-6307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD A. JASPER, a/k/a William Antoine Jasper
Defendant - Appellee:
R. DEEL, Floor Officer, TRAVIS MCCOY, Lieutenant, Watch Commander, N. HUSTON, Floor Officer and others
Jasper v. Deel et al
as 7:2008cv00044
Plaintiff:
Edward A. Jasper
Defendant:
R. Deel, Travis McCoy, N. Huston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hackett v. Taylor
as 07-7307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK HACKETT
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIE J. TAYLOR, CO, FRANK BROWN, CO, ARNOLD JOHNSON, CO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
