Cases 11 - 20 of 5,077
Cobbs v. Harrell et al
as 5:2024ct03106
Plaintiff:
Rodney Elroy Cobbs
Defendant:
Richard K. Harrell and Ricardo Jensen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Henry v. Nurse Lydia
as 24-6438
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT HENRY, a/k/a Chicken Man
Defendant:
NURSE LYDIA, NURSE TAMARA, NURSE BRITTANY and others
US v. Nathaniel Mitchell
as 24-6437
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
NATHANIEL TYREE MITCHELL, a/k/a Savage
Watson v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Kevin A. Watson
Defendant:
M. Hamilton, K.D. Ramey, Mr. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolliver v. Barker et al.
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Hiram Tolliver
Defendant:
D. R. Barker, K. L. Ross, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steed v. Lynch et al
as 5:2024ct03105
Plaintiff:
Byron Steed
Defendant:
Sgt. Lynch, Sgt. Bunn, Sgt. Hobgood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frank Reid v. Corizon Health Services
as 24-6422
Plaintiff:
FRANK REID
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES, Virginia Department of Corrections Contract Medical Provider, J. BLEDSOE, Red Onion State Prison Medical Administrator, DOCTOR FOX, Red Onion State Prison Physician and others
Jesus Jehovah v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6428
Plaintiff:
JESUS EMMANUEL JEHOVAH, a/k/a Robert Gabriel Love, a/k/a Gabriel Alexander Antonio
Defendant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Deputy Director, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Michael Gorbey v. Assistant Warden Crickard
as 24-6418
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey, a/k/a Michael S. Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
CRICKARD, FCI Estill S.C., COMMISSARY STAFF DUERK, FCI Estill S.C., COUNSELOR PLATTS, C-B; FCI Estill S.C. and others
US v. Maurice Geter
as 24-6405
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MAURICE DARNELL GETER, a/k/a Rease
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
