Cases 11 - 20 of 24
KNOTT v. USA
as 1:2019cv00859
Petitioner:
LEONARD J. KNOTT
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Knott v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv01647
Defendant:
JOANNE A HARTUNG, TINA LOUISE CARDER, Lori Slavick and others
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS KNOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Green v. McGrue et al
as 1:2017cv00037
Plaintiff:
Julian Lee Green
Defendant:
Amanda McGrue, Warden of Martinsburgh Corr. Center, Mary Knotts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tunstall v. Hogan et al
as 8:2015cv01580
Plaintiff:
Marcus Tunstall
Defendant:
Larry Hogan, George C. Edwards, Joseph M Getty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sprouse v. Knott, Jr. et al
as 1:2014cv01432
Plaintiff:
Jon Eric Sprouse
Defendant:
Bishop Knott, Jr., W. Allen Sharrett and Jay Paul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyles v. W V Division of Corrections et al
as 5:2012cv00182
Defendant:
W V Division of Corrections, Scott Paugh, Mary Knotts and others
Plaintiff:
Jason R. Boyles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oxendine-Bey v. Raper et al
as 5:2012ct03051
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Oxendine-Bey
Defendant:
John Raper, John Walters, John Knotts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plummer v. South Carolina et al
as 8:2010cv01966
Defendant:
State Of South Carolina, Allendale Fairfax Sheriff Department, Allendale Fairfax Magistrate Court and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Plummer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOINER v. KNOTT et al
as 1:2009cv00927
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND DAKIM HARRIS JOINER
Defendant:
J. KNOTT and B.J. BARNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Luther v. James Rubenstein
as 09-6725
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS LUTHER
Plaintiff:
EUGENE BLAKE, JOHN E. PRICE, JR., RUSSELL E. GARRETT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES RUBENSTEIN, Commissioner, DAVID BALLARD, Warden, C. J. RIDER, Religious Services Coordinator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
