Cases 11 - 20 of 78
Daniel v. Coles et al
as 7:2023cv00624
Petitioner:
Jazzman L. Daniel
Defendant:
Coles, Sgt. K. Boyd, Sgt. McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel v. Coles et al
as 2:2023cv00435
Plaintiff:
Jazzman L. Daniel
Defendant:
Coles, Sgt. K. Boyd, Sgt. McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCLAIN v. LOWERY et al
as 1:2023cv00639
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MCCLAIN
Defendant:
C. LOWERY, RAMON R. GUTIERREZ, MELANIE SHELTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClain v. USA
as 3:2023cv00376
Petitioner:
Travis McClain
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wable v. North Central Regional Jail (Jane Doe) et al
as 5:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
Charles Raymond Wable
Defendant:
North Central Regional Jail (Jane Doe), Jane Doe, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Byrd v. Cisco et al
as 8:2023cv01717
Plaintiff:
Ivey Nicole Byrd
Defendant:
Lt Cisco, Sgt Capps, Judge Roper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
David Meyers v. Ronnie Scott
as 23-6038
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIT MANAGER RONNIE SCOTT, WARDEN STEVEN JACOBS, SERGEANT DIAL and others
McClain v. Bivens, Warden
as 1:2022cv00674
Plaintiff:
Renard McClain
Defendant:
Carlos D. Bivens, Warden, Carlos D Bievens and Warden - R.C.I.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Brown et al
as 1:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Dai'Shawn M. Neal
Defendant:
Jeanne Brown, Amy Ashworth and Robert D McClain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cowles v. McCoy et al
as 7:2021cv00368
Defendant:
Lt. Dye, Sgt. Horne, The Mador and others
Plaintiff:
Clint Devin Cowles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
