Cases 11 - 20 of 169
US v. Juan Sanchez
as 23-6500
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN SANCHEZ
Elyas v. Sanchaz
as 1:2023cv00784
Plaintiff:
Sameer M. Elyas and Sameer Mohamod Elyas
Defendant:
Sanchaz and Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez-Partida v. Dunbar et al
as 6:2023cv01219
Petitioner:
Mario Alberto-Sanchez Partida and Mario Alberto Sanchez-Partida
Respondent:
Warden Dunbar and FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sanchez Arceo v. Jhonsen
as 5:2023ct03074
Plaintiff:
Alexez Nicolas Sanchez Arceo
Defendant:
C/O T. Jhonsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moreno-Sanchez v. Rokosky et al
as 1:2023cv00151
Petitioner:
Santos Moreno-Sanchez
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky and Warden LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Moreno-Sanchez v. Rokosky et al
as 5:2023cv00013
Petitioner:
Santos Moreno-Sanchez
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky and Acting Warden LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Justin Myrick v. G. Hurlock
as 22-7426
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN ORLANDO MYRICK
Defendant / Appellee:
G. HURLOCK, Major/Security, GOLON, Sgt, SANCHEZ, 1st Sgt. and others
Sanchez v. USA
as 2:2022cv81503
Petitioner:
Juan Sanchez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Guzman v. Warden, SFF Hazelton
as 5:2022cv00061
Petitioner:
Johanna Sanchez Guzman
Respondent:
Warden, SFF Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Malik et al v. Parker et al
as 3:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
Yaya Bilal, Talib LNU, Nafis Akeem Alim Abdullah Malik and others
Defendant:
FNU Parker, FNU LNU, FNU Maddox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
