Cases 11 - 20 of 167
Robbins v. Torres
as 3:2023cv02241
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ray Robbins
Defendant:
Aubree Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Torres v. Wiedemann
as 7:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Rosales Torres
Defendant:
W. Wiedemann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinloch v. Murray et al
as 2:2023cv00695
Plaintiff:
Damien Kinloch
Defendant:
City of North Charleston, Sasha Murray and Jose Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Torres-Ayala v. Rokosky et al
as 1:2023cv00078
Petitioner:
Jose Torres-Ayala
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky and Acting Warden Lefever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
De la Torre v. Rokosky et al
as 1:2023cv00047
Petitioner:
Estevan De la Torre
Respondent:
Rokosky and Acting Warden Lefever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv03122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1255 Immigration: Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition
Sammartino v. City of Hardeeville
as 9:2022cv03055
Plaintiff:
Salvatore Sammartino
Defendant:
City of Hardeeville, South Carolina and Oscar Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farabee v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
Brian Damon Farabee
Defendant:
Nelson Smith, Angela N. Torres, Angela Harvell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. United States
as 7:2022cv00228
Petitioner:
Jimenez Torres, Hector Jimenez Torrs and Hector Jimenez-Torres
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
