Cases 21 - 30 of 44
CANADY v. FIELD et al
as 1:2015cv00479
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK CANADY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE FIELD, KATY POOLE, ALICE MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cornelius Corey v. Faye Daniel
as 15-6707
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORNELIUS MAURICE COREY
Defendant - Appellee:
FAYE E. DANIELS, MICHAEL T. GIBBS, ERNEST RIGGS and others
JOINER v. POOLE et al
as 1:2015cv00248
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND DAKIM HARRIS JOINER
Defendant:
KATY POOLE, MURPHY and ALICE MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spellman v. Mascio
as 9:2015cv01275
Plaintiff:
Reginald Spellman
Defendant:
Alice Mascio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minch v. Brown et al
as 3:2014cv00858
Plaintiff:
Richard P. Minch
Defendant:
Karen Brown, Alice T. Howell, A. Lincoln James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corey v. Daniels et al
as 5:2014ct03265
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Maurice Corey
Defendant:
Faye Daniels, Michael T. Gibbs, Ernest Riggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. USA
as 1:2014cv00097
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Alice Rice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Oliver v. Perry et al
as 5:2014ct03045
Plaintiff:
Keith Bayseam Oliver
Defendant:
Frank L. Perry, George Solomon, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Nelson
as 1:2009cv00697
Plaintiff:
Alice A. Williams
Defendant:
Amber Nelson, Alice Lowe, Blankenship and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Virginia Goforth v. Harley Lappin
as 11-6510
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VIRGINIA ARLENE GOFORTH and MR. GOFORTH, Virginia Arlene Goforth's Husband, and et al
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director of Bureau of Prisons, NEWTON KENDING, Bureau of Prisons Medical Director, AMBER NELSON, Warden, Alderson Federal Prison Camp and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (and specifically herein), FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General or Predecessor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
