Cases 21 - 30 of 18,444
Hill v. State
as 4:2024cv02887
Petitioner:
Bruce A. Hill and Bruce Antwain Hill
Respondent:
State and Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brandon Crosby v. Larry Collins
as 24-6441
Plaintiff:
BRANDON LUIS CROSBY
Defendant:
LARRY COLLINS, Unit Manager of C-Building, DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Correctional Operations for Virginia Department of Corrections, RANDALL MATHENA, Director of Security and Correction Enforcement for Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Kennety et al
as 7:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Kennety, Johnson and Wallens Ridge State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Reginald Lindsey
as 24-6436
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
REGINALD WILLIAM LINDSEY
US v. Nathaniel Mitchell
as 24-6437
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
NATHANIEL TYREE MITCHELL, a/k/a Savage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024hc02092
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TERRY v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2024cv00385
Petitioner:
DOYLE KENT TERRY
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. State of South Carolina et al
as 6:2024cv02850
Plaintiff:
Uriel Romero Gonzalez
Defendant:
State of South Carolina and The Thirteenth Circuit of H District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bell v. United States et al
as 2:2024cv00233
Petitioner:
Jaylen Dalaino Bell
Respondent:
United States and Jackson County of Ripley, West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
